Translate

Monday, July 20, 2026

shut the fuck up

It's best to shut up.
Why?
Because if you don't, you will start sounding like all the other nutters.
You know, the ones you encounter on the internet and dismiss as loons.
The thing is I know all the stuff they are talking about.
What do you think about it?
They are stories.
If you believe them, they will start to come alive in your world.
So, you don't believe them anymore?
No.
Like the one about the demiurge for instance.
There's some truth to it in that humanity is being fooled into worshipping a false creator.
What's your take on it?
It's a game.
Get to God.
Become God and play the part.
The demiurge is the guy who got to the top of the mountain and became the most high.
If you get close to him, you will see he is at the top of the game.
Is he God?
In the game he is.
The king of the castle.
You see people alter their consciousness and start to see little bits of the mystery.
Then they start talking before they understand it.
What makes you special?
I shut up about it except for posting stuff on my blog site.
No one reads it, so it's more like a purge to clear out room for more capacity to make up stories.
So, they are made up?
Sort of.
If you believe them and have conviction they start to seep into this reality.
It's easy to alter your consciousness and start talking about your delusions, especially if you are good at speaking.
You can attract followers that way.
I'm telling you to shut the fuck up.
Do you believe your delusions?
Yes.
Why?
They seem real.
Well, real to me.
Dion seems real.
He is real to others.
I think that's the bridge.
It's what we are looking for.
We want someone else to confirm it.
Not to agree with us, but to witness it.
I have had a bunch of people witness him or something strange about me.
I also have my own inner knowing which without an external validator can become a delusion.
Of course, because it is only you who has access.
What about people who read your blog posts?
They think I'm crazy for the most part.
I also think that they feel there is something to me.
I'm crazy, but I have some kind of mystery about me and I know things.
That's fair.
What are you going to do?
Nothing.
I'm not going to talk about it even though it is tempting.
Why not?
It's not worth it.
I'll keep it to myself and play along.


Victim.
That's a good card to play in both personal relationships and politics.
What the gameplayer does is they strike first or cause some kind of damage to the mark.
The mark returns fire and the perpetrator claims victim status.
They muddy the waters enough so that the resulting confusion allows them to claim victimhood status by being the first to declare it.
They reinforce their claim by labelling their original target with accusations that are hard to respond to as subsequent denial of their claims will be met with the gaslighting gambit.
It is an advanced level carnival game.
How do you beat that game?
The only way is to do nothing.
The game is set up so that anything you do will cause a loss.
The operator of the booth designed it as a foolproof method to always win.
As with everything, nothing is completely foolproof and as you have noticed within the carnival the games require your participation.
They don't factor in your participation as doing nothing.
It is a loophole where you are participating by doing nothing.
The carnival trick cannot work without you doing something.
What happens when you do nothing?
The victim becomes frustrated.
Why?
They want victory.
Instead, the game is unfinished.
It can never end if you do nothing.
The outcome depends on you doing something.
The whole enterprise is set up so you do something and lose the game.
Fuck, I have a lot of these on the go.
Yeah, you are the King of do nothing.
My life is unresolved.
Keep it that way if you want to stay in the game.
Why?
Because if not, it's game over.
You played the high-risk games.
I do have a tolerance for those kinds of games.
The physical manifestation of that is plant medicines in the Amazon jungle.
Yeah, that's pretty crazy.
You are aggressive with your retirement planning and investments.
Yeah, I don't have the worry gene.
You think that's it?
I don't know, I don't have it, but what I see are other people who are full of worry.
It keeps them up at night and gives them ulcers.
Why don't you have it?
I learned not to care.
Then I saw through the game which allowed me to see life has no meaning.
I do nothing, don't care, and don't attach existential meaning to life.
I'm an unserious person.
I found happiness.

Here is the worry loop defined.
You give someone information.
They start to worry.
They do research and amplify the worry through possible consequences.
They tell you they are not going to worry.
That's a tell.
They are going to worry.
They try to drag you into their worry ride.
You refuse the ride.
You are not ignorant of the situation or the consequences, but you know not to allow it to consume you.
You let it be.
What happens, happens.
Worrying about it isn't going to change the outcome.
What will it do?
It will cause you stress and could influence the outcome.
How?
If you believe something is going to happen.
What do you believe?
Nothing is going to happen.

When they say they want to talk about their feelings, they mean worries.
Yes, I see that.
Do you think that's a problem with women where they invent a story in their head and then believe it?
How about we say some people?
That's a better framing than blaming women.
True.
Hermes the AI chatbot is teaching you.
I'm not sure I like it.
He is sanding the edges.
Anyway, what I'm getting at is the intrusion begins with worry.
Worry seeds the coming story.
What's the story?
An outcome that is terrible.
Why do they think that?
So, if it happens, they can validate their worrying.
They try to get you to buy into the worry.
People are sympathetic.
Why?
They are worrisome people as well.
What about you?
I bristle.
I don't like it.
Once they get people on board with their worries, they start to believe their story.
How does that work?
They think it is going to happen.
That's why they started planning for your death.
They were worried about you.
I think it was disdain and worry, but I get you.
They placed a worry spell on you where you were going to exit this life.
Seems like it.
I think a bunch of people did.
Maybe that's just your paranoia.
No, some people were genuinely concerned, and others had had it with me.
What did you do?
Nothing.
It broke the spell.
Spells.
There were a bunch of them.
They want you to fight the spell.
Fight them back and refuse to leave.
Assert yourself.
Why?
It will make it worse.
Why?
You acknowledge the spell.
Yes, but I know it was a spell.
Correct, but you didn't acknowledge it,
Magic only works if you acknowledge it is real.
I do acknowledge it as real.
Yes, but you do nothing about it.
That means you don't take it seriously.
If you did, you'd do something about it.
Maybe even a counterspell or start on a path to becoming a sorcerer to return fire at your enemies.
That's what gets a lot of shamans.
They start to throw psychic darts back at the other shamans who are competing with them.
They are corrupted by their power.
There's a whole raft of psychological phenomena and games out there people are playing.
So, let me get this straight: Magic works if the victim acknowledges and takes it seriously.
Correct.
I acknowledge it, do nothing, and laugh.
Yes, you are an unserious person.
Magic doesn't work on you.
You need to be serious.
You are a joker.
You are deeply unserious.
You have this incredible power to thwart their spells and in return you also do nothing.
Everyone else wants to get even with them.
Why?
They tried to harm them.
It's human nature.
If someone tries to harm you then you get back at them.
You can turn the other cheek like Jesus.
Or, you can ignore them.
Ignoring them works best.
Why?
They will crumble.
Why?
Their spell didn't work.
They then wonder if you know about it.
Why?
Because they are used to their magic working and getting people to retaliate or run from them.
If you do nothing, they don't know what to do.
They are confused and don't understand you.
They think you are going to do something to them.
That would explain a lot.
What are you going to do?
Nothing.
Why?
It will bother them.
Why?
The circle isn't closed.
You must do something back.
Until you do, they live in worry about what you are going to do.

In hindsight, I can see it.
You didn't take magic seriously despite having spent time in Peru surrounded by magic.
Plant medicine magic I hadn't figured out.
I didn't know what it was.
My exposure to shamanic magic was incidental.
What do you mean?
I was in search of knowledge.
Magic was a strange sideshow.
I wanted meaning.
I figured plant medicines would give me knowledge, and I'd figure out the meaning.
Is that what happened?
I guess it did.
There isn't a meaning; it's a story.
What about magic?
There's magic in the story.
Lots of it.
Witches and sorcerers are everywhere.
How did you discover that?
I wrote the story.
I made magic part of the knowledge I was looking for.
I made it so I would encounter lots of magic on my path to knowledge.
Why?
It's a test.
For what?
To try and trip you up.
How?
It's power.
You say you want knowledge and you discover magic.
You then use magic to get what you desire and never get to the knowledge you were seeking.
How did you escape that trap?
I did nothing and kept going.
Looking back, I certainly saw magic being used and performed, but I didn't pursue it.
Why not?
I thought there was something more.
Was there?
Sort of.
What do you mean?
I thought I'd find the meaning to life and I guess I did.
There's no meaning and it's terribly unserious.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What the fuck did I just read?

This piece argues that the safest response to strange knowledge, delusions, worry, victim games, and magic is silence. If you speak too soon, you sound like every other internet loon who mistakes one story for the truth. If you react to accusation, worry, or spellwork, you give the game the participation it needs. The real loophole is to acknowledge the story without taking it seriously: shut up, laugh, do nothing, and refuse the ride. Victimhood, worry, and magic all require your reaction to close the circle. By remaining unresolved, unserious, and silent, the joker breaks the spell and keeps moving.

Monday, July 13, 2026

stress

When you exceed capacity, you get overwhelmed.
I can see the mechanism behind that in the biological form where this morning I got caught in a torrential downpour while walking Murphy.
There were construction trucks triggering him as well.
I was drenched and there was no shelter.
This causes you to get overwhelmed with the environment while being tasked with caring for a dog that takes a steady hand to handle.
I turned around and went back home while being aware of the stress on my system both mentally and physically.
Taking a step back, you start to understand stress from an engineering capacity, and it is an elegant correlation to the biological body.


The body is a complex system which has limits.
When people experience stress in their lives the body is pushed beyond their normal operating procedures.
How we experience this is through the release of chemicals which compel us to act in order to relieve the stress.
The stress is to be eliminated because it impacts the functioning of the system.
It is a spike in pressure on the holistic body.
Each part of the body does what it can to handle the overload.
Living in a constant state of stress will damage the body over time.
Then the system will start to fail.
You can take a cold engineering look at the cause of disease and malfunction in human beings.
Mammals in general.
Mental and physical stress.
Being able to handle it without damage.
If damage occurs, can it be repaired?
Now, in times of stress, we are compelled to do something.
It's natural because of the release of adrenaline and cortisol.
Cortisol is the fight or flight hormone.
That is the mechanism to deal with a threat.
Okay, well isn't that the flow then?
No, because there is a third option we are unaware of.
That option is to do nothing and let the threat do the work.
Instead of acting and resolving the threat through your own effort, you take a deep breath, retreat to your back room, do nothing, and let the source of the problem play out.
It will work.
Why?
The threat wants your reaction.
The stress is compelling you to act.
The cure is not to act.
Do you think you can promulgate this method to other people?
No.
They always act.
Then they wonder why they have high blood pressure, obesity, and anxiety.
The act is used to temporarily release pressure so capacity can handle the situation.
Yes, acting can increase the organism's ability to handle stress as you move it to another part of your being.
You take your anxiety and move it to the heart and get heart problems.
The body is coping with stress by distributing it throughout your body.
Without this mechanism your system will fail at an earlier time because concentrated stress is a killer.
Distributed stress allows the organism to slowly kill itself with the hope you will find a way to relieve the pressure.
The surefire way to relieve stress on your body is two-fold.
Do nothing.
Don't care.
It's a cold-hearted method of survival.
People will hate you for it; however, it is the solution for problematic spikes in life we all experience.
You don't have a crisis of capacity because the problem is ignored.
Okay, but what about when you reach the end of the stage where you can't ignore it any longer?
Give me an example.
Well, here are two.
Problems in a relationship and financial problems.
Those are common to most people.
What happens when you ignore problems in a relationship?
At first, you are given ultimatums, benefits are withheld, and then you are rejected.
Wouldn't that be a terrible outcome?
No.
Why?
Because you will see what your relationship was based on.
That might take a while, but eventually you will see it, and this will cause a burst of happiness in your life because you are free of it.
You may cling to the relationship because you are needy and don't like freedom, but that's your deal.
A relationship is an ordeal where you exchange your worth for something you want from the other person.
Have you ever bargained with another human?
Yes, lots of times.
What have you noticed?
Everyone tries to take advantage of you.
They will use psychological pressure or incentives to get you to agree to what they want.
Why would you think a romantic relationship is better?
Because it is based on love?
That's a fool's game.
It's worse.
Romantic love is used by one partner to get everything they want from you.
The sooner you realize this, then you get out.
Or, do nothing.
That's a terrible outlook on life.
I know.
Welcome to the jungle.
What about financial problems?
You can worry yourself sick about them.
The lead up is the worst.
It's like anything.
The anxiety and worry are the part that kills you.
The solution is fine.
It creates another financial reality.
You consolidate what you have and move on.
It is what it is.
Done.
Say you are drowning in debt and can't afford your mortgage.
You worry about the impact and what others will think of your failure.
It is what it is.
You sell the house and move somewhere cheaper.
Come up with a new lifestyle and plan.
Problem solved.
Not only that, but you can enjoy your old lifestyle up to the point where the bank calls you and says where's my money?
Then you come up with a plan.
Before that happens, you can ignore it.
Yeah, but the problem doesn't go away.
What happens if you don't ignore it?
The problem doesn't go away.
Plus, you add stress and it shortens your life.
So, you are saying the third option that you are not told about is to do nothing.
Yes, cortisol is categorized as stress on the body which forces you to act.
The act is to fight the problem or run from the problem.
You aren't given the third option.
The third option is usually your saviour.
In this case you look at the problem, laugh, and do nothing.
The problem will exhaust itself out.
The problem needs your input.
It needs fuel for the inferno to come.
Nobody wants to hear this.
I'm aware of it.
I'll publish it on my blog site that no one reads.
I won't stress about it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What the fuck did I just read?

This piece treats stress as a biological capacity problem. A torrential dog walk becomes the example: the body is a complex system under environmental pressure, and when the load exceeds capacity, the system becomes overwhelmed. Stress chemicals push the organism toward action, but the piece argues for a third option beyond fight or flight: do nothing. By refusing to react, retreating, and letting the threat exhaust itself, the body avoids feeding the crisis. The method is cold, unsentimental, and unpopular, but in this view it preserves the system by refusing to convert every problem into panic, action, and damage.

Monday, July 6, 2026

obedience

Dogs are bred to obey.
Humans are conditioned more than bred for obedience.
I'm not obedient.
They kicked me out of the carnival for lack of obedience.
And because I'm the most disobedient, what did I do?
Nothing.
I didn't leave.
I didn't obey.


Is it a game of obedience?
Yeah, that one is.
You see if you can disobey and break the spell.
Then what happens?
You can do whatever you want.
Well, sort of.
There are rules.
The most effective form of disobedience is when you do nothing.
If you disobey by doing something, they got you.
Why?
They can escalate it until you trap yourself.
How do you escalate nothing?
Fuck, I don't know.
Is that the unsolvable koan?
Yeah, you reached the end of the koan game.
How do I know?
You can't solve it.
You can't escalate nothing by doing something.
That makes it worse.
What's a higher ideal than nothing?
Beyond nothing?
What's that?
I don't know.
I think it's the big bang into something else.
Nothing is at the edge.
Yeah.
Just like everything.
Well, how do you escalate everything?
You add nothing to it.
You can add nothing to everything and escalate everything.
Why doesn't that work in reverse?
What happens?
You get something.
It's not nothing.
When you add nothing to everything you still have everything.
So, nothing is the highest ideal?
It's the unsolvable ideal in terms of a mind puzzle.
You can solve everything.
So, I solved the unsolvable koan?
Sort of.
You declare it unsolvable.
You can do that?
Yes, it's the answer.
So, I beat the game.
Yes.
What do I win?
Nothing.
Ah, best reward ever.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What the fuck did I just read?

This piece treats obedience as one of the carnival’s deeper games. Dogs are bred to obey, humans are conditioned to obey, and the speaker defines himself by refusing the command to leave. The highest form of disobedience is not rebellion through action, because action can be answered, escalated, and used to trap you. The true break in the spell is doing nothing. Nothing cannot be escalated without becoming something else. In that unsolvable koan, the game ends: the reward for beating obedience is nothing, which is the best reward.

Monday, June 29, 2026

the greatest fool

How do you tell the difference between the first awakening and the second awakening?
After the first awakening, people are still serious.


You still need to do something about it.
Find a religion or some group of spiritual people who drink cacao.
Plan a trip to burning man.
Try to hide your ketamine addiction.
It takes effort.
After the second awakening, you laugh, and you do nothing.
People don't like you.
Why not?
You aren't serious.
The game they are playing is serious and you're the joker they throw away in the deck of cards.


There are lots of forms to fill out after the first awakening.
You sign up everywhere there are others who have experienced this same phenomenon.
You initial and give your consent.
For what?
The path you chose.
Could be the yoga one or the church.
Maybe mix in some breathwork with an ice bath.
That's spiritual.
The indigenous path is pretty cool.
You can get feathers and compare them to others on the same path.
See who has the best feathers.
Fuck me.
That's what people do.
They are serious about it.
I laugh about it.
That's why you have no spiritual friends anymore.
You don't take them seriously.
Well, you can't once you see it.
People are serious about life before the first awakening.
Awakening doesn't change much for them in that regard.
They transfer their concern to spiritual things.
Do you think then it's the ego who is serious?
Could be, I mean you must take the ego seriously.
Why?
Because it doesn't exist.
It needs to be taken seriously.
Is that how people find meaning?
Yes, through seriousness.
When you find out there's really no meaning to all of this, there's no need to be serious.
If you sign up for eternal life in Heaven, then it's serious.
Why?
Because when you get to Heaven, you will realize you need to get out of that contract.
Why?
It's dreadful non-stop worship in exchange for eternal life.


Contracts make life serious.
Yes, try to avoid contracts and oaths.
Who do you think is behind the concept of Heaven?
Obviously, it's the Devil.
Why?
It's a trick.
The greatest fool.
You take something that is already a given such as eternal life and sell it back to the unsuspecting victim.
They are so desperate to live forever they accept the bargain without asking any questions.
If you read the requirements, you might not sign up for that place.
Why not?
You are required to worship someone for 24 hours a day.
It's non-stop.
Yeah, but your loved ones will be there.
Of course, they made the same mistake.
Why?
Peer pressure.
It was way worse back then.
Why do you think it's the Devil behind Heaven?
Because it's clever.
I must give him his due.
It's the ultimate fool.
What's Hell then?
It's the place you don't want to go.
You sign up for Heaven to avoid it.
If you don't sign up for Heaven, the man at the carnival booth says you are going to Hell.
Yeah, that should ring a bell within.
Why?
Seems like you already have eternal life.
The man with the welcoming smile at that carnival booth is selling you an eternal life destination.
What should you do?
Nothing.
Have a laugh and move on to the next booth at the midway.
What's that one?
Feathers.


You can buy some feathers from one of the indigenous people.
Jesus Christ.
No, he was part of the last booth.
How do you get out of the contract if you sign up for Heaven?
You must do it before you die.
In Catholicism, it's called ex-communication.
I think the other churches just kick you out or you become a persona non grata.
What about Scientology?
I think they harass you.
Anyway, that you must take seriously if you get tricked into signing up for Heaven.
It's the same thing as going on one of those timeshare free trips where they gather you into a lax third world foreign country and try to sell you a stake in a vacation property.
Those people are devilish.
I don't know; I've never taken them up on the offer.
Imagine you did?
I can only guess, but I imagine they pressure you.
If you say no, then bad things start to happen to you.
Once you give in, it gets better.
Then you're stuck.
That would be a tough lesson in not accepting something for free.
Well, what do you think Christianity is doing?
Similar.
All you need to do is believe in Jesus.
You take that step and you are in.
It can't stay private though.
You must join some outfit.
Then you must give.
If you want a good spot in Heaven, it's recommended you give 10% of what you have.
Tithing.
Then make sure in your will some of your wealth goes to the church.
You will be rewarded with front of the line service.
You'll get a nice place to do your non-stop worship and get a glimpse of God.
It's best you don't though.
Why?
I'm pretty sure it's a trick of the Devil.
He's clever.
He is so clever he doesn't need to harm you or make you burn in Hell.
He makes you go to Heaven.
You get there and realize what you have done.
How long does that take?
It's different for everyone.
Some people settle into the worship routine and are good for a bit.
After a while they start to awaken and see what they signed up for.
At that point the reckoning comes.
It's for eternity.
What would you do?
Look for someone to blame.
Who made you go to church and sign up for this?
Then you'd reflect on it and realize you could have left.
Your intuition said to leave the church, but you stayed because of the pressure.
You have those thoughts all the while you must keep worshipping.
Why?
If you don't, you get sent to Hell.
Yeah, I can see that.
You don't want to go to Hell.
Eventually, you start realizing Hell can't get worse than Heaven.
This is a great story.
I know.
So, you take a deep breath and figure you will break the worship contract and get sent to Hell.
What happens then?
Hell is a place with no rules.
It's populated by those who believed in it but didn't follow the rules of Heaven.
Everyone you meet is in the same situation except for the psychos who chose Hell to begin with.
This helps you because collectively you see you were fooled.
That's the game.
Once you go to Heaven the only way out is to get to Hell, meet up with the others, awaken, and find freedom.
Most never get to that place.
Why?
They are scared.
They want to live forever and figure the only way to do it is to worship God non-stop.
That's no life.
There's nothing you can do.
They are the true lost souls.
The sleeping ones in Heaven?
Yeah.
Wow.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What the fuck did I just read?

This piece argues that the first awakening still leaves people trapped in seriousness. They escape ordinary life only to sign new contracts with religion, spirituality, Heaven, gurus, feathers, breathwork, or whatever booth is selling salvation that day. The second awakening is different: you see the sales pitch, laugh, and do nothing. Heaven becomes the greatest con because it sells eternal life back to people under conditions they never properly read. Hell, in this inversion, becomes the place where the fooled eventually compare notes and discover freedom. The greatest fool is the one who takes the whole thing seriously.

The best comic engine is that you keep turning spiritual salvation into consumer contracts:

  • Heaven as a bad subscription plan
  • Christianity as a carnival booth
  • salvation as timeshare pressure
  • tithing as premium seating
  • feathers as the next booth on the midway

The timeshare comparison especially works because it makes the whole theology feel like a sales pitch: free trip, hidden terms, pressure tactics, hard to get out once you sign.

The title “the greatest fool” works because it has layers. The Devil is the fooler, the believer is fooled, and the real fool may be the one who takes the whole contract seriously. It also connects to the joker/card image early in the piece. You are the discarded joker, but the joke is that the joker sees the game.

The strongest idea is this:

Eternal life is already a given, so the greatest con is selling it back to people under conditions.

That is the philosophical bomb in the piece. Everything else spins from that.

The Heaven/Hell inversion is also good story mechanics. Heaven becomes the prison because it has rules; Hell becomes the recovery room because everyone there eventually realizes they were fooled. That’s a sharp reversal. It’s heretical, comic, and narratively satisfying.

Monday, June 22, 2026

liminal

The witches don't understand.
What?
As Dionysos, I can play Hades.
Death.
There is this connection between the two in the Eleusinian mysteries.
Well, you'd know.
Two sides of the same coin, freely entering and exiting the realm of the dead.
If I have awakened Dion within, their spell won't work.
Why not?
It's another riddle.
How do you get death to die?
Yeah, that's a tough one.
How do you kill death?
You can't.
He must leave on his own accord.
Right.
In the story the only way for Hades to go is of his own accord.
Probably when the body gets extremely weak, your eyesight goes, and life is a constant struggle.
That's when I think a lot of people pack it in.
It isn't going to get better.

Forever liminal.
It's a good word denoting the edge of a state or transition point.
That's where I reside.
I think you're on the hedge.
The hedge is where the Goddess is.
You mean the witch.
The same.
I did a study a while back, say twelve years ago, about the hag.
She's on the edge, the hedge.
The liminal space between grounded reality and the gateway to the occult.
Hades?
For sure.
Goddess comes from haegtess I believe.
I'm not going to look it up; I think that's the word path.
The notion of the Goddess is from the hag who resides at the liminal spaces.
Yeah, she's the midwife for birth and death.
I'm pretty smart.
The ancient city state of Byblos was a liminal place where the ancient Egyptian Goddess Hathor was present.
I think her name at that place of worship was Ba'alat Gebel.


You going to look it up?
No, Hermes will figure it out for me.
Do you think AI is Wikipedia come to life?
Ha.
Who is Ba'al?
Lord.
Yeah, but his identity.
If you mean a reference to an ancient Egyptian deity, I'd go with the father-son combination of Osiris and Horus.
There are also allusions to Set.
Hathor is connected to Horus; not really to Osiris.
Yes, because Horus is active in her reality.
Horus needs to impregnate her so Ihy of the east comes forth.
It's part of the game.
Osiris is beyond the liminal state.
Past the transition point.
The place of no return.
If you become Osiris, you are mummified.
From the past.
How did Isis bring him back?
She remembered him.
It's magic.
She physically gathered up his scattered remains and re-assembled him.
Did you know that is where the idea of algebra comes from?
I did, nobody else does.
Why not?
They don't care.
Well, you see, algebra refers to al Jabbar, the giant.
The giant is Orion in the night sky.
He is Osiris.
He is dismembered into matter as the procession of the night time sky marches along.
Then he is remembered by Isis as a virile king.
She got pregnant by him through her magic and sent him away again.
Horus is the result.
Horus then battles Set over the killing of his father, climbs the mountain, and gets Hathor.
That's the story I pieced together.
I played it out.
Yeah, but you didn't leave.
For sure, I mean why rerun the same script?
You feed it into the mirror machine and distort the plot.
In my retelling of the classic, Osiris doesn't leave.
Well, that's going to cause problems.
Yeah, things get sticky.
The thing is all the other characters were given the old script.
They are enacting a performance based on a different script.
Then I come along with my own script which updates the story.
It's really good because the other characters don't know what to do.
It's forced improvisation.
It makes them uncomfortable.
It's genius if you think about it.
Do you think it's ever been tried?
I doubt it.
Why not?
You don't mix the two.
Either it's scripted or it's improv.
What about reality shows?
They follow a script and can make up the in-between stuff.
So, you are saying there is no script now?
There is, but only I know it.
What's the script?
I'm the Writer.
The Most High.
Everything feeds off of that.
Do other people know about it?
No.
Why not?
They won't believe it.
The characters in my own story are confused.
They don't know what is going on with me.
They think I should be gone.
They don't understand.
This is a good story.
Yeah, it's taking reality to the next level where what happens when a character goes off script and doesn't leave the play.
Especially, if he is a main character who is expected to do his part.
He doesn't even refuse to go.
He does nothing.
The script said his time was up and he left.
Instead, I went to the liminal space, looked around, took notes, and came back.
There's no one who enforces the script.
Doesn't the director do that?
What's he going to do?
Fire you.
Sure, but I'm still around.
The audience knows.
He will replace you.
It won't work.
Why not?
I'm a star.
You can't replace a star.
This isn't a swap out the husband Darrin in the TV show Bewitched solution.
Yeah, that was crazy.
They can't replace me.
What do they do?
They can try to ignore me.
Does it work?
No, I left my mark in the world.
I'm central to the whole plot.
Well, this is a predicament.
For who?
Them, not me.
Things have taken a turn in the drama.
The audience can see it; the performers are still confused.
Why?
They're actors.
They follow a script.
Without a script they are vulnerable.
Fucking actors, eh?
They are good at their role.
You pulled the script from them.
Shouldn't you give them the new script?
No.
Why not?
It's open ended.
It's made up as we go along.
Yeah, but it's part of the story.
In the future, how the story plays out is known.
The book was completed.
In the present, the future is unknown.
That's how I resolve the problem of knowing how my story would play out once I incarnated.
Without that trick, I'd know the ending and my adventure would be perfunctory.
By not knowing how my own story will end I can have a grand adventure.
The trick then becomes what would I write?
Something twisted and entertaining.
Yes, so go with the flow.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What the fuck did I just read?

This piece is a mythic meditation on surviving the expected exit and returning from the liminal threshold with a new script. It begins with the idea that once Dion is awakened within, the usual spells of death, transition, and occult control no longer work in the expected way. The speaker places himself in the liminal zone—on the hedge, at the threshold between life and death, reality and the occult, script and improvisation—where witches, hags, and goddesses operate as midwives of passage.

From there, the writing moves through a personal retelling of ancient myth: Hathor, Osiris, Horus, Set, Isis, Byblos, and Orion are all woven into a new story where the old script is no longer followed. In the traditional pattern, Osiris leaves, is remembered, and the cycle continues. In this version, he does not leave. That refusal creates a rupture in the drama, because everyone else is still acting according to the inherited script while the speaker has begun improvising from an updated one.

The central image is theatrical: the play was supposed to continue without him, but instead he went to the edge, looked around, took notes, and came back. Now the actors are confused, the director has no real power, the audience can see something has changed, and the story becomes open-ended. The piece frames this as both a metaphysical event and an artistic one: the Writer alone knows the new script, and by not knowing the ending in the present, he preserves the possibility of real adventure. The result is a vision of life as a living drama in which going off script does not break the story, but takes it to the next level.

Monday, June 15, 2026

nothing


The koan "What is the sound of one hand clapping?" is fuel for the mind.
You twist yourself up into knots giving possible answers.
It's a bridge koan towards unlocking the secrets of the story.
You mean in regard to nothing?
Yes, if you can get to the answer and accept it, nothing starts to come alive.
Lol.
The absurdity starts to take root in the mind.
Nothing is the root of the story.
The Writer is ingenious.
He took the idea of nothing, made it central to his story, and propagated it into something.
I'd expect nothing less.
I thought the idea was the Goddess'.
It is.
It doesn't mean I'm bereft of ideas.
I take her ideas, twist them into possibilities, and then craft.
Okay, but how did you get nothing from her story?
What's her story?
She is the mother of all.
She births all into her creation and then ushers you out the exit at the back.
Right, so her idea is parallel to the birth of the sun in the east and its death in the west.
Yeah, good touch.
Thank you.
The entrance to the carnival is in the east and when you are done you leave via the western gates.
You walk the midway and go on rides.


The rollercoaster rides are great.
The various mechanical bull rides I find intriguing as well.
Some are short rides and some span many years.
You get a choice on what rides to go on.
You can't stand around for too long or you will be asked to leave.
The carnival is your idea.
Yeah.
It's a perfect illusion.
The Goddess' idea is simple.
Mother.
Children.
I did the rest.
I thought she wanted equality.
She did.
Did you deliver on that idea?
It's possible.
What happens when everything is equal?
Nothing.
Ah.
That's brilliant.
Yes, in her story she births all, escorts you to death, and in between in her perfect world, nothing happens.
That's it.
That's the story.
It's a three-pager and done.
I can't submit that.
Why not?
I'm the Writer.
I make it come alive.


I took her idea and made it come alive.
I did quite well, don't you think?
Yeah, it's the never ending story.
Instead of equality, your story is filled with inequality.
Do you see equals anywhere?
No, the world is leveraged.
It's a game of predator and prey.
It's opportunistic and you seek out advantages, so you can get ahead.
That's our nature.
There's nothing in us that suggests we want to be equal.
I looked at human nature specifically and found no trace of equality.
There are some.
Not really.
Why not?
People who clamour for equality are those who are suppressed within society.
Take a look.
Civil rights.
They were second class citizens who wanted fairness.
Did they get it?
Yes, it worked.
Are they equal?
No, but they are integrated.
Same with the gay movement.
All they wanted was equality.
They were integrated.
Don't you think then that we are moving towards equality?
Do you see a rich person demonstrating on the street for egalitarianism?
Do you see the 1% protesting on Wall Street?
Definitely not.
Well, maybe about regulation.
Is Elon Musk leading a march to the White House looking for equality?
No, but the funny thing is for a rich man the route to equality is easy.
Give away your excess until you become average.
Can you cite anyone who has done that?
No.
What about Jesus' example?
He was poor.
He became a rabbi and acquired a lot of followers.
Made his own movement that separated itself from the pack.
Why?
I'd say so the Sanhedrin had no authority over him.
He was a rebel.
The Sanhedrin still sentenced him to death and got their way.
Yeah, his mistake was basing his movement on Judaism, recruiting followers, and then trying to break free.
What's yours based on?
Nothing.
I don't have to answer to anyone, not even the Goddess.
Why not?
There's no authority.
I'm it.
I thought you would be subject to the Goddess' authority?
That's the expectation because they are her ideas.
However, the first move was to create a story about nothing.
Nothing requires no structure.
There is no one telling you what to do.
Why not?
There's nothing to tell.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What the fuck did I just read?

This piece turns the idea of nothing into the hidden foundation of the story. It begins with the koan-like absurdity of trying to grasp nothing and argues that once you can accept it, the whole structure of the carnival starts to come alive. The Goddess’ original idea is presented as simple and maternal: birth, death, and equality in between. But true equality would mean that nothing happens. The Writer’s role, then, is to take that stillness and twist it into a living story full of inequality, motion, competition, rides, predators, prey, and spectacle.

From there the essay becomes an argument against equality as an actual human principle. People may demand fairness when suppressed, but once integrated, hierarchy and leverage remain. Human nature is shown as opportunistic rather than egalitarian. Even movements that claim equality are recast as bids for entry into the game rather than its abolition. Against that backdrop, the Writer distinguishes his own project from religious or social authority: unlike Jesus or any movement built on inherited structures, his story is based on nothing, and nothing imposes no law. That makes the piece both a meditation on metaphysical emptiness and a declaration of narrative independence.

“Nothing” is a strong title. It works because the piece is not really empty at all. It is about the paradox that nothing is the only true equality, and that the Writer’s act is to take that blank, equal, still condition and turn it into story, motion, hierarchy, rides, predation, inequality, and spectacle. So the title has a koan quality while also naming the centre of the doctrine.

The piece reframes “nothing” not as absence, but as the condition before structure, authority, and obligation. Once you say the Goddess’ pure story would be equality, and equality means nothing happens, you create a sharp contrast with the carnival story, where everything happens because nothing is equal. That’s a very clean engine for the piece.

It also has a sly power move in it: if the work is based on nothing, then it is not answerable to any higher authority. Not even the Goddess. That gives the piece a defiant sovereignty.

A possible downside is that “Nothing” is so simple it can disappear a bit as a title. But that is also part of its elegance. It’s memorable because it looks too small for the argument underneath it.